חומר רקע

Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-022-00523-y PERSPECTIVE Child food insecurity in the wake of the COVID‑19 pandemic: urgent need for policy evaluation and reform in Israel’s school feeding programs Janetta Azarieva1, Elliot M. Berry2 and Aron M. Troen1*    Abstract  Even in high-income countries like Israel, children have been particularly vulnerable to the surge in food insecurity driven by quarantines, unemployment, and economic hardships of the COVID-19 pandemic. Under normal circum- stances, School Feeding Programs (SFPs) can help to ensure child food security. In the wake of the pandemic, policy makers worldwide have been challenged to adapt national SFPs to provide nutritional support to children (and indirectly to their families) during extended school closures. Most national SFPs implemented contingency plans to ensure continued nutritional support for children. In Israel, where SFPs were largely suspended during long periods of mandated school closing, there was a loss of 30–50% of feeding days for the ~ 454,000 children enrolled in the program. The lack of emergency contingency planning and failure to maintain Israeli SFPs during school closures reveals longstanding structural policy flaws that hindered coordination between relevant ministries and authorities and impeded the mobilization of funds and existing programs to meet the emergent need. The school feeding law does not identify child food security as an explicit aim, there are no benchmarks for monitoring and evaluating the program to ensure that the food aid reaches the children most in need, even routinely, and the Ministry of Education had no obligation to maintain the program and to marshal data on the participants that could be acted upon in the emergency. Moreover, because Israeli SFPs are “selective”, in other words, implemented according to community risk (low-income, high poverty rate) and geographical factors, attendant stigma and financial burdens can make participa- tion in the program less attractive to families and communities that need them the most. We argue that Israel should make urgent, long-term improvements to the SFPs as follows: First, eliminating childhood food insecurity should be made an explicit goal of legislation in the broader context of national social, health, and nutritional goals, and this includes ensuring SFPs are maintained during emergencies. Second, the government should assume responsibility for the routine assessment and data collection on food insecurity among Israeli children. Third, SFPs should be subjected to rigorous independent program evaluation. Finally, a “universal” SFP providing nutritious diets would likely improve the health of all Israeli children, across all socioeconomic backgrounds. These steps to guarantee that Israeli children have food to realize their full physical and cognitive potential would emphasize Israel’s firm commitment to support © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creat​iveco​mmons.​org/​licen​ses/​by/4.​0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creat​iveco​ mmons.​org/​publi​cdoma​in/​zero/1.​0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Open Access *Correspondence: [email protected] 1 The Nutrition and Brain Health Laboratory, The Institute of Biochemistry Food Science and Nutrition, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 76100 Rehovot, Israel Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Page 2 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 Background “One cannot equate a person who has bread in his basket to one who hasn’t.” (Talmud Bavli, Yoma 74b) The COVID‑19 “stress test” The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed deeply entrenched social, economic, and health disparities around the world [1–3]. Surging food insecurity is a particularly urgent concern, even in high-income countries, and Israel is no exception. Disruptions to the supply and demand for food, price hikes, widespread unemployment, quar- antines and closures, have all restricted physical and economic access to food. Children are particularly vul- nerable to food insecurity, which may cause irrevers- ible damage to their physical, cognitive, and emotional development. The prevalence of child food insecurity in Israel has always been a concern. It was first detailed in the semi- nal national food security survey by the Myers JDC Brookdale Institute that documented that 22% of Israeli households were food insecure [4]. Follow up studies by Israel’s National Insurance Institute and Central Bureau of Statistics, most recently from 2016, estimated that 638,000, or a quarter of all Israeli children lived in food insecure households and fourteen percent, or 352,000, experienced severe food insecurity. In total, 50.6% of Arab children, 26.3% of Jewish haredi (ultraorthodox) children, and 17.0% of Jewish non-haredi children were food insecure [5]. These surveys measure food insecurity using the Household Food Security Survey questionnaire developed by the United States Department of Agricul- ture (USDA), which defines food insecurity as “limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways.” Severe food insecurity describes households that worry seriously about abil- ity to afford and obtain food, and that have significantly reduced the quality or quantity of food they consume, including the experience of hunger. Childhood food insecurity in Israel is associated with poor metabolic health and paradoxically with obesity as it is elsewhere around the world. Financial constraints and uninformed food choices in food insecure house- holds often lead to poor diets characterized by over consumption of cheap processed and ultra-processed foods and reduced intake of more expensive nutritious food, together with poor lifestyle and exercise habits [6, 7]. As a result, food insecure children may suffer the dou- ble jeopardy of excessive caloric intake and micronutrient deficiencies (so-called “hidden hunger”), resulting in a high prevalence of nutritional deficiencies and obesity [8, 9]. The 2015–2016 Israeli National Health and Nutrition (MABAT) youth survey found that 29.9% of middle and high school students were overweight or obese [10, 11]. Current data from the Ministry of Health indicate that in 2021 overweight and obesity remain highly prevalent among Israeli children in elementary school, with rates that increase from 19.5% and 21.9% in Jewish and Arab children in the first grade, to 30.0% and 44.0% in Jewish and Arab children in the 7th grade, respectively (MOH Nutrition Division, personal communication), Thus, even before the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a demonstra- ble need for a focused and integrated policy response to combat child food insecurity and obesity. As in other countries, the pandemic has exacerbated this social crisis [12]. It is increasingly urgent to help the growing numbers of economically and newly challenged sectors in Israel’s population that are experiencing food insecurity, a key indicator, and result of poverty. In the absence of current official data [5], “Latet”, a major Israeli food bank, conducted a survey between September and October 2020. Using the USDA questionnaire, they esti- mated that the prevalence of food insecurity increased significantly during the pandemic to some 656,000 households, or 22.6% of the population. These house- holds included 799,000 children (32%); and for 395,000 children, or 15.8%, the condition was severe [13]. Current national school feeding programs (SFPs) were established in 2005 and are an important policy instru- ment to provide nutritional support to some the most disadvantaged Israeli children. According to a recent report by the Knesset Research and Information Depart- ment, some 454,400 children or approximately 19% of Israeli schoolchildren are currently eligible for the pro- gram. However, while school feeding is preferentially implemented in municipalities that are of lower socio- economic strata and therefore more likely to include chil- dren from food insecure households, enrollment is not directly linked to food insecurity, so the programs do not reach all those in need. Moreover, since the SFPs were suspended in almost all schools during several extended multiple dimensions of health, educational achievement, and societal values, to combat the complex and long-term consequences of the pandemic, and to prepare for the next one. Keywords:  Food insecurity, School feeding programs, Nutrition policy, Malnutrition, COVID-19, Israel Page 3 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 school closures, participants lost 30–50% of their school meals over a year [14]. Thus, it is crucial to recognize the negative impact of suspending the SFPs, especially given the widespread economic hardship caused by the pan- demic, and develop policies to ensure that they meet the critical and growing needs of food insecure children and their families. To the best of our knowledge, the current Israeli SFPs have neither been described nor evaluated in the peer- reviewed literature. This narrative review outlines the scope of the existing programs and policy based on gov- ernment documents and contemporary reports, and provides an initial account of their operation during the pandemic. We hope these data will stimulate discourse, research, and evaluation leading to improvement and reform of the current SFPs. Main text School feeding programs in Israel before and during the COVID‑19 pandemic SFPs were established in Israel in the decade following independence and terminated in the late 1970s in an era of increased social and economic prosperity [15]. The Knesset re-established them in 2005 and legislated the Daily Meal Law, mandating that pupils attending ele- mentary school until 4 pm, 4 days a week in "extended school day programs" would receive one hot meal per day (lunch). Children with shorter school days are not eligible nor are middle and high school students. It is notewor- thy that the law does not mention the social motivation behind the legislation—mitigating food insecurity among children—nor does it explicitly state the social rationale for the extended school day program [16]. The important point here is that the policy should be fully implemented and achieve its underlying purpose. By law, the ministers of Education and Finance deter- mine which, and how many of the children in extended school day programs are eligible for the SFP. The Ministry of Education, local authorities, and parents are the three main contributors to fund and operate the programs. The cost is shared between the Ministry of Education and the municipalities with the split ranging from 70% of the budget covered by the municipality in communi- ties of high socioeconomic status (7th and 8th deciles) to 20% of the budget in communities from the lowest socio- economic strata (the 1st decile). Accordingly, municipal authorities are allowed to charge families a percent of the meal cost based on a progressive price schedule tied to the household’s per capita income that is approved by the Knesset Education Committee. The average daily meal cost per pupil is about NIS 15 (~ 4.5 USD) of which par- ents pay up to 7 NIS. However, due to barriers to means testing, municipal authorities usually set a flat rate for all families; while, at the same time, designated committees provide a discount when appropriate [14, 16]. Using the same method, meals are now provided to students in two additional supplemental education pro- grams, “Milat” and “Nitzanim”, which support children from low-income families in Israel’s periphery. According to the Knesset Research and Information Department, in 2019 “Milat”, provided meals for ~ 23,000 at-risk children, and “Nitzanim” provided meals for 240,000 preschool and first and second grade children enrolled in after school supplemental education. In addition, 191,000 chil- dren were eligible for a hot lunch under the original 2005 law because they participate in an extended school day. In other words, SFPs serve a total of ~ 454,000 students [14]. Approximately 45% of these children live in munici- palities in the two lowest socioeconomic deciles and 90% in communities below the median. All three programs are run through the Ministry of Education and managed by the Division of Supplementary Learning Programs. In addition to these programs, the Ministry of Labor and Welfare provides meals to approximately 120,000 chil- dren in various pre-schools, after-school day care, and boarding schools for at risk youth, but the extent of over- lap between children receiving meals in both the Minis- try of Welfare and Education programs is unknown. The SFPs are centrally administered by the Ministry of Education and they operate according to the MOE Direc- tor General’s directive (“xozer mankal”) which describes the roles and responsibilities of the ministry, municipali- ties, school principals and food suppliers [17]. The MOE issues a tender for the SFP management company, which is responsible for overall operations, and which currently oversees 25 approved sub-contracted food suppliers. The ministry tender determines the scope of activity of the subcontracted suppliers, and specifies which sub- contractor will supply food to the different municipali- ties and schools. The tender also specifies criteria for the menu according to Ministry of Health dietary guidelines. The SFP management company oversees the food sup- pliers and monitors food safety, quality and waste [18]. The municipalities or school operators decide on the mechanism of collecting parental payments, e.g. whether these are made to the municipality, the school operators or directly to the selected food supplier. The number of participating children determines the number of meals delivered by the supplier to the school. Meals are deliv- ered either in bulk or individual meal trays [17]. According to a report by the Arlozorov forum, the total Government budget for SFPs in 2019 was 928 million NIS (290M USD) including both Ministry of Education and Welfare budgets, of which some 82%—760 million NIS (81%) was utilized [19]. According to the Knesset Research and Information Department report, the total Page 4 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 budget reported for the three programs by the Ministry of Education was 2.15 billion NIS and was comprised of 650 million from the government and 1.5 billion from the municipalities and parent payments [14]. This makes the SFPs the second largest item in the Ministry of Educa- tion budget after payroll. Nevertheless, the law does not specify benchmarks for monitoring and evaluating the funding framework to ensure that the food aid reaches the children most in need [16, 20]. Consequently, it is not the children’s needs but rather the municipal authorities’ financial priorities that primarily determine if and how SFPs are locally implemented [21, 22]. In 2009, 4 years after the program was launched, the Israel State Comptroller’s Office issued its first critique of the SFPs. The report officially recognized that the primary objective of the School Feeding Program was to alleviate food insecurity among children. It criticized the programs for falling short of this objective, reporting that between 2004 and 2008 the number of eligible pupils increased while the number of pupils actually participat- ing in the SFPs decreased and the fact that the program impacts had not been formally evaluated [20]. Two sub- sequent State Comptroller reports document continued challenges meeting the SFPs objectives in the context of municipal government programs and the central govern- ment’s overall responsibility for combatting food insecu- rity. Since then, parliamentary oversight committees, the Knesset Research and Information Department, and the National Nutritional Security Council have also docu- mented the on-going challenges of extending enrollment to all food insecure children [14, 23, 24]. A problem in reaching the target populations may stem from the fact that the Israeli SFP takes a “selective” approach. In other words, it is structured according to risk (preferential inclusion of low-income, high poverty rate communities) and geographical factors. The atten- dant stigma may make participation in the program less attractive to individuals and communities, and needy populations, especially in the periphery, who may be less likely to enrol, as is the case in other countries [25–28]. The relevance of these recognized barriers to participa- tion elsewhere, needs to be evaluated with respect to the Israeli SFPs. Furthermore, because the selective eligibil- ity criteria do not include food insecurity, the schools and Ministry of Education have no data on participants’ food security status, and the programs do not cover food inse- cure children in middle school and high school. Clearly, based on the above-mentioned prevalence of child food insecurity, the SFPs do not reach all food insecure children. Indeed, the data from the aforemen- tioned food security surveys indicate that food insecu- rity reaches into the middle class, and conversely, that not all households and children in Israel’s periphery or lower socioeconomic communities are food insecure. In addition, since meals are provided only when schools are open, many children go hungry over long periods when they are shut down, whether for holidays or due to strikes, and now during long quarantine closures. Moreo- ver, the tri-partite funding structure of the SFPs is even less effective during the present economic crisis, when the Ministry of Education is unable to implement, or be accountable for, the programs on its own, and munici- palities and parents are hard pressed to contribute [21, 22]. Finally, the logistic framework, whereby the meals are prepared and delivered by multiple independent and uncoordinated producers who lack any common infra- structure, makes the management of meal production, its quality, and supply inefficient, and a serious impediment to locating and serving those in gravest need, whether during the pandemic or any other national emergency. A “universal” SFP, not predicated on prior criteria such as assessments of food insecurity, might aim to tackle a wider range of societal problems and ensure that all chil- dren have access to nutritious food in schools, thereby promoting the health of all children [29, 30]. A recent policy perspective in the New England Jour- nal of Medicine highlighted the crucial importance of ensuring continuity in nutritional support for food inse- cure children when school is closed, even in high-income countries like the USA, and of reforming SFP policy after the pandemic to this end [31]. Unlike many other countries—such as the UK, USA, Brazil, and India [32], Israel has no contingency plans to provide meals for eli- gible children during unforeseen school closures. During the first lockdown in March 2020, schools were closed for ~ 30 days resulting in the suspension of all SFPs. Rec- ognizing the probable consequent harm, the Ministries of Education, Health, and Labor, Social Affairs and Social Services appealed to the Finance Ministry and obtained budgetary approval to distribute meals to 18,000, or a mere 4% of children participating in SFPs in the most disadvantaged communities and schools. An addi- tional 17,000 institutionalized at-risk children, or 14% of the ~ 120,000 children in Ministry of Welfare frameworks [14, 33] continued to be fed. The distribution was car- ried out by the IDF Home front command with the help of community volunteers. Two hearings of the Knesset’s Special Committee for the Rights of the Child in October and November 2020 investigated how and why the Gov- ernment did not ensure that children would continue to receive such vital food aid during subsequent emergency closures [34, 35]. This lapse was especially egregious dur- ing the second closure when the need was known, the budget available, and successful experience on the record from the first closure in the spring. The representative of the Ministry of Education testified that responsibility Page 5 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 for the SFPs had been transferred to the Israel Defence Forces’ Home Front Command. However, none of the government officials who testified clarified how this decision had been reached, nor could they provide data on the number of children who had received such meals during the second closure, which lasted between 12 and 37  days depending on age [14, 34, 35]. On January 6, 2021, the government announced a third school closure, which lasted for 25–33  days, again without providing food assistance to children in need [14]. In total, depend- ing on age group, children lost between a third and a half of their school meals during the year from March 2020–2021. This does not include meals lost due to split- ting of classes between capsules or children quarantined at home after exposure to ill classmates or teachers, even when schools were officially open. This brief account highlights the lack of an organized government policy to manage and prioritize programs to address child food insecurity. The failure is twofold: the demonstrable lack of coordination between Ministries and authorities and their inability to mobilize funds and implement existing programs to meet the urgent need. Moreover, the failure to collect official information on the identity and number of children with food insecurity severely hampered efficient delivery of food aid by the relevant authorities during the crisis [34, 35]. International perspectives on protecting SFPs and child nutrition during the pandemic National SFPs have been used as a widespread policy tool to achieve a variety of social aims: providing children with a healthful diet to allay malnutrition, fight childhood overweight and obesity, and ensure their full physical, intellectual, and emotional development. School lunches can provide children with nutritional quality superior to food obtained from other sources, even in high-income countries like the USA and the UK, where this is a criti- cally important tool to both narrow social and health ine- qualities between children from low- and high-income families and to improve dietary quality and lifestyle hab- its of children across the board [36–39]. Globally, some 368 million schoolchildren in 169 countries participate in SFPs. In high- and middle-income countries, SFPs are almost exclusively financed by the state, while in low-income countries they rely on donor and NGO sup- port that covers up to 83 percent of their costs. Research elsewhere shows the positive impact of SFPs on rais- ing enrollment and educational performance, reduc- ing absenteeism and classroom hunger, and promoting social equity [30, 40]. In middle and high-income coun- tries, SFPs have proven effective both as a welfare policy for alleviating socioeconomic disparities and as a way to inculcate healthy lifestyle habits and to fight obesity in a dignified, non-judgmental, and equitable way [41, 42]. The need to protect child nutrition programs dur- ing unforeseen school closures is well described in the nutrition policy literature [43–47]. Many countries and international NGOs such as WHO and UNICEF have contingency plans to feed children when schools are forced to close because of infectious disease outbreaks such as influenza or Ebola, natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, and floods, and vio- lent conflicts [48–50]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, school closures in 88 countries affected some 246 million children in SFPs globally. However, the majority of these countries responded rapidly by supporting and strength- ening their SFPs so that they could provide alternatives to feeding the children in school during the COVID-19 pandemic closures: 52 countries provided schoolchildren with take-home rations; 14 countries used various other modes of distributing food; while 13 countries provided cash transfers to schoolchildren’s families [32]. Notably, the Indian Government adapted the Mid- day Meals program, (the largest school feeding program in the world), to ensure that schoolchildren continue to receive their basic sustenance during the pandemic. Modalities for distribution range from household cash- based transfers to the delivery of uncooked grains or cooked meals, with decisions left to the states. [32]. In Brazil, the government expanded the Bolsa Familia Pro- gram to maintain and even increase coverage includ- ing a series of Emergency Cash Withdrawals to support families affected by COVID-19 [32]. In the United States, the Federal Government’s Families First Coro- navirus Response Act (March 18, 2020) empowered the US Department of Agriculture to approve state govern- ment plans to provide emergency food stamp assistance to households with school-aged children who would otherwise benefit from free or reduced-price meals had there not been school closures and a variety of meas- ures were implemented to coordinate federal and local programs [31, 51, 52]. In the United Kingdom, by the end of March 2020, the government formally launched a national voucher scheme to ensure that the 1.3 million eligible school-aged children continue to have access to meals during school closures. Under the scheme, each school-aged child received weekly vouchers of 15 pounds sterling, redeemable at all major supermarkets. Families with school-aged children could ascertain their eligibil- ity through the government website. The schools were responsible for delivering the vouchers to the relevant pupils [32]. These examples show that it is possible to provide continued food aid to eligible children even during extended school closures, where the importance of feeding vulnerable children is prioritized. However, Page 6 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 despite the scope of the problem and significant budget, infrastructure, and expertise, Israel has yet to make this a priority. A better way forward Since the pandemic and its social and economic fallout are still far from over, it is imperative for Israel to develop strategies for the short- and long-term. To provide nec- essary ongoing food aid to children during emergencies and closures, the government should immediately pro- vide alternative food-assistance, whether through cash vouchers or direct delivery, as described above, notably in India, the US, and Brazil. A designated Ministry or agency should be assigned responsibility for coordinat- ing, implementing, overseeing, and monitoring such emergency responses, and a budget dedicated to ensure continued delivery of food or alternative assistance. In the long-term, there are three major problems with SFPs that must be addressed with immediate data gath- ering and planning. First, legislation should be revised to make combatting childhood food insecurity an explicit goal within the broader context of social and health goals, such as academic achievement, nutrition, and life- style education and also delineating clear responsibili- ties and accountabilities. Legislative amendments must codify contingencies to maintain SFPs for future emer- gency school closures, and regularly monitor the gap between the growing number of food-insecure children and the number of children eligible to participate in gov- ernment programs. One cannot close the gap if its size is unknown. Contingency plans should support healthy diets for children by allowing for food or cash equiva- lents to be provided to the families of all participating children through all school grades, and provision should be made to protect food-insecure children during school holidays and the summer months. Moreover, SFPs should be made responsive to changes in the geographical and national distribution of household food insecurity, with mandatory, periodic evaluation, ideally every school year. Under the existing law, municipal authorities are expected to finance at least 10 percent of the programs’ costs, but they are not challenged when they fail to do so due to budgetary shortfalls, weak administrative capacity, or both. The failure to combat household food insecurity in general, impinges on national security and resilience [53–56]. Ensuring that citizens of the “startup” nation are not living with hunger is unequivocally the govern- ment’s obligation and responsibility. Prolonged politi- cal indecision has allowed municipal authorities and the Ministry of Education to play “pass the buck” and blame each other for failure to implement the programs. Dur- ing emergencies, as in the current pandemic, they need to provide timely data to the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Welfare, Ministry of Health, and to the Min- istry of Defense and Home Front Command, so they can effectively coordinate and manage emergency food deliv- ery and inform national policy and resourcing [12]. In turn, the central government should provide municipal authorities with adequate funding for these activities, as well as adequate food assistance programs to meet cur- rent need [12, 34, 35, 57]. A second requirement, in addition to a change in leg- islation, is regular surveys to monitor child food insecu- rity in Israel. The primary source of data at present is the Food Security Surveys conducted by the National Insur- ance Institute (Bituach Leumi) of Israel. The most recent survey in 2016 followed families interviewed in 2011 and 2012 to ascertain the persistence (natural history) of food insecurity. The latest household food security survey conducted by the National Insurance Institute in the first half of 2021 has yet to be published. An additional source is the National Health and Nutrition Surveys (MABAT) carried out by the Ministry of Health,1 although these do not specifically focus on food allocation within the household. Moreover, neither of these cross-sectional surveys focuses on childhood food insecurity, nor are they rou- tine or frequent enough to respond to acute changes in need, such as those experienced during the pandemic and its aftermath. The SFP administration in the Minis- try of Education and their interface with municipalities’ schools and social services departments is an obvious channel through which information on the extent of need could be monitored at the level of schools and if neces- sary individual students. The distribution of meals to 18,000 children during the first closure demonstrates that such coordination is indeed possible. Legislation is needed to assign responsibility to rel- evant agencies (e.g. schools, municipal welfare depart- ments, Israel center for disease control) in a cross-cutting collaboration with children at the center, and grant them the necessary authority to collect relevant data, includ- ing obesity and malnutrition among children. The lack of such systematic official data and public research makes it difficult to adequately evaluate Israel’s SFPs, to set defined and measurable policy outcomes, and to use the data to improve the program. 1  MABAT Surveys are cross sectional national surveys carried out for the Ministry of Health by the Central Bureau of Statistics under the direction of the Israel Center for Disease Control. The surveys include comprehensive self- reported questionnaires on health, demographics and a food frequency ques- tionnaire (FFQ) for different age groups including children. Some iterations have administered a version of the USDA Household Food Security Survey questionnaire, which the National Insurance Institute adapted for use in Israel. Page 7 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 More than 15 years after the SFPs inception, a rigorous independent program evaluation is necessary, as is the norm elsewhere [58, 59]. Not until 2015 did the Ministry of Health issue guidelines on children’s nutrition in edu- cational frameworks. The report, "To eat and grow in the afternoon programs" for ages 3–10  years, describes the components of the meal, the frequency of the food items, and portion size [60]. The Ministry of Education which implements the program, carries out the only routine oversight of the SFPs [61]. However, their data, as pub- lished online in the “Control of suppliers summary” focus only on food safety and waste [62]. It does not address the social and educational aims of the program, or the problem of obesity, participants’ health, their scholastic and cognitive achievements, emotional wellbeing, and school attendance. Conclusions The current pandemic is a litmus test for the resilience of SFPs in Israel, as elsewhere, and of whether they are adequate to meet their goals as currently designed. It is undeniable that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel and its economic and social consequences will long affect the future of society including food security among schoolchildren. Immediate changes and improve- ments are urgently needed in the short term; and policies must be re-evaluated and adjusted for long-term sus- tainability. SFPs need to be flexible to accommodate to changing circumstances. The available data show Israel’s SFPs have inadequately addressed child food insecurity during the pandemic. Participation is not fully realized, and thus despite the considerable public resources invested to achieve the program’s important goals, it has been impossible to assess whether these goals are being achieved. For exam- ple, to improve and sustain the SFPs in Israel we need to know: How do the SFPs affect their participants’ nutri- tional and physical health? How does participation affect their social, emotional, cognitive development and edu- cational performance? How does it affect school enroll- ment, absenteeism, and atmosphere? How do the SFPs affect families’ budgets and food security? And what is the impact of SFP on the geographical distribution of child food insecurity? This lack of reliable and relevant data of the program’s impact on health and educational outcomes for individuals, their families, and communi- ties, hampers efforts to ensure that the program is effec- tive and adequately resourced. If neglected, persistent and prevalent food insecurity may have far reaching consequences on the cognitive development of children, and down the line, for national security and resilience. Extensive international experience demonstrates that enforceable government policy can effectively reduce children’s food insecurity. Such a policy will enhance multiple dimensions of health, educational achievement, and society [30, 31, 58, 63]. Israel must make it a priority that all Israeli children have enough nutritious food to achieve their full physical and cognitive potential. Israel can and must use this critical time to develop formal data-driven benchmarks that can be used to adapt, evalu- ate, and administer SFPs. This can help prepare for the next pandemic and emergency which will surely come [63, 64]. Abbreviations IDF: Israel Defence Forces; SFP: School feeding program; WHO: World Health Organization. Acknowledgements We thank the J. Gitler Foundation for generous support of the Troen lab’s research on food security and food policy in Israel. We dedicate this paper to the memory of our friend and colleague, Prof. Dov Chernichovsky, founding chair of The National Nutritional Security Council, who strove tirelessly until his untimely passing to realize the vision of a just and thriving Israel, in which no child or person will want for food. Authors’ contributions JA and AMT conceived of the work; JA, EMB and AMT wrote and made substantive contributions to the revised manuscript. All authors read and approved of the submitted version and agree both to be personally account- able for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. Funding Food security and food policy research by the Troen laboratory at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem is made possible by an unrestricted gift from the Gitler Foundation. The foundation had no role in the design of the study, collection analysis, and interpretation of the data or in the writing of the manuscript. Availability of data and materials Not applicable. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Author details 1 The Nutrition and Brain Health Laboratory, The Institute of Biochemistry Food Science and Nutrition, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 76100 Rehovot, Israel. 2 The Hebrew University‑Hadassah Braun School of Public Health and Commu- nity Medicine, The Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9112102 Jerusalem, Israel. Received: 22 January 2021 Accepted: 4 February 2022 Page 8 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 References 1. UN. Policy brief: the impact of COVID-19 on food security and nutrition. 2020. https://​www.​un.​org/​sites/​un2.​un.​org/​files/​sg_​policy_​brief_​on_​ covid_​impact_​on_​food_​secur​ity.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 2. FAO. Impact of COVID-19 on food security and nutrition. Rome. 2020. http://​www.​fao.​org/​filea​dmin/​templ​ates/​cfs/​Docs1​920/​Chair/​HLPE_​Engli​ sh.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 3. FSIN. Global report on food crises. September update: in times of COVID- 19. Rome. 2020. http://​www.​fao.​org/​emerg​encies/​resou​rces/​docum​ents/​ resou​rces-​detail/​en/c/​13125​40/. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 4. Nirel N, Rosen B, Erez S, Ben-Harush A, Berg-Warman A, Brodsky J, Nitzan- Kalusky D, Haviv-Messika A, Goldsmith R. Food security in Israel in 2003 and its implications for patterns of nutrition. Catalog # RR-445-05. Myers JDC Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem. 2005. https://​brook​dale.​jdc.​org.​il/​en/​ publi​cation/​food-​secur​ity-​israel-​2003-​impli​catio​ns-​patte​rns-​nutri​tion/. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 5. Endeweld M, Heler O, Barkali N, Gottlieb, D. Food security survey 2016. Main socio-economic findings. 2018. National Insurance Institute, Jerusa- lem. https://​www.​btl.​gov.​il/​Publi​catio​ns/​resea​rch/​Docum​ents/​mechk​ar_​ 127.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 6. Chernichovsky D, Regev E. Patterns of expenditure on food in Israel. 2014. Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel. https://​www.​taubc​enter.​ org.​il/​wp-​conte​nt/​uploa​ds/​2020/​12/​e2014.​16pat​terns​offoo​dexpe​nditu​ re79.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 7. Azarieva J, Orion B, Goldsmith R, Ginsberg A, Milman R, Chernichovsky D. A healthy food basket in Israel. Enliven Archive, 2018. 5(1)1. http://​www.​ enliv​enarc​hive.​org/​artic​les/a-​healt​hy-​food-​basket-​in-​israel.​pdf. 8. Endeweld M, Goldsmith R, Endevelt R. The demographic and morbid- ity characteristics of a population receiving food support in Israel. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2018;7(1):54. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​ s13584-​018-​0238-8. 9. Efrati Philip D, Baransi G, Shahar DR, Troen AM. Food-aid quality correlates positively with diet quality of food pantry users in the Leket Israel food bank collaborative. Front Nutr. 2018;18(5):123. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​ fnut.​2018.​00123. 10. Ministry of Health. MABAT youth second national health and nutrition survey of 7th–12th grade students 2015–2016 [Hebrew]. 2017. https://​ www.​health.​gov.​il/​Publi​catio​nsFil​es/​mabat_​youth_​2015_​2016_​Full.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 11. Ministry of Health. MABAT youth first national health and nutrition survey of 7th–12th grade students 2003–2004. https://​www.​health.​gov.​il/​Units​ Office/​ICDC/​mabat/​Docum​ents/​Metho​ds_​Eng_​MABAT_​youth.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 12. The Knesset. The Knesset special committee for the novel coronavirus and the state’s preparedness for epidemics and earthquakes (October 12, 2020) [Hebrew]. https://​main.​kness​et.​gov.​il/​Activ​ity/​commi​ttees/​ Coron​aVirus/​Pages/​Commi​tteeA​genda.​aspx?​tab=​3&​ItemID=​21466​06. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 13. Latet. Alternative poverty report number 18 [Hebrew]. 2020. https://​ www.​latet.​org.​il/​upload/​files/​16074​10626​5fcf2​3c27d​24926​6981.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 14. Rabinowitz M, Weissblei E. Food security among Israeli children: government activity in routine times and during the corona pandemic [Hebrew]. June 30, 2021. Knesset Research and Information Department. The Knesset. Jerusalem. https://​fs.​kness​et.​gov.​il/​globa​ldocs/​MMM/​7a277​ a9f-​1319-​eb11-​811a-​00155​d0af3​2a/2_​7a277​a9f-​1319-​eb11-​811a-​00155​ d0af3​2a_​11_​18097.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 15. Edevelt R. School lunch programs in Israel, Past and Present. Hygiea Inter- nationalis. 2007;6(1):93–105. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3384/​hygiea.​1403-​8668.​ 076193. 16. Daily Meal Law [Hebrew]. 2005. The Knesset. Jerusalem. https://​www.​ nevo.​co.​il/​law_​word/​law01/​999_​376.​doc. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 17. State Comptroller. Implementation of the extended school day law – feeding program [Hebrew]. 2009. Jerusalem. http://​www.​mevak​er.​gov.​il/​ sites/​Digit​alLib​rary/​Docum​ents/​2009-​Shilt​on-​103-​Hazana.​doc. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 18. Feeding and Education for Proper Nutrition in Educational Institutions: Standing Directive 0070—Substitution [Hebrew]. Published 4.4.2016. 19. Hasdai-Ripa, T. Analysis of feeding programs in Israel [Hebrew]. Arlozorov Forum. 2020. https://​www.​arloz​forum.​org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2021. https://​apps.​educa​tion.​gov.​il/​mankal/​horaa.​aspx?​siduri=​70. Accessed 27 Nov 2021. 20. Law for the Supervision of Food Quality and Proper Nutrition in After School Programs, 5777–2016 [Hebrew]. 2016. The Knesset, Jerusalem. https://​www.​nevo.​co.​il/​law_​html/​law01/​501_​498.​htm. Accessed 27 Nov 2021. 21. Dahan, M. The effects of intergovernmental transfers on municipalities’ budget. Israel Economic Review. 2022. In press. 22. Ben-Bassat, A, and Dahan, M. The political economics of the municipali- ties. Jerusalem, Israel: The Israel Democracy Institute (2009). https://​en.​idi.​ org.​il/​publi​catio​ns/​6660. Accessed 31 Jan 2022. 23. State Comptroller. Review of municipalities’ Implementation of “Tzila”— afternoon enrichment program [Hebrew]. 2014. https://​www.​mevak​er.​ gov.​il/​he/​Repor​ts/​Report_​269/​ac410​bdb-​cb74-​4edb-​a983-​c837e​7e969​ 46/​104-​new.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 24. The Knesset. Knesset Education, Culture and Sport Committee. Hearing on feeding in educational institutions—implementation, scope, food quality and more (April 9, 2018) [Hebrew]. https://​main.​kness​et.​gov.​ il/​Activ​ity/​commi​ttees/​Pages/​AllCo​mmitt​eesAg​enda.​aspx?​Tab=​3&​ ItemID=​20680​40. Hearing protocol. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 25. Watts A, Araiza AL, Fernández CR, Rosenthal L, Vargas-Rodriguez I, Duroseau N, Accles L, Rieder J; The Campaign for Universal Free Lunch in New York City: Lessons Learned. American Academy of Pediatrics New York Chapter 3 committee on nutrition and obesity and the community food advocates. Pediatrics. 2021;148(4):734. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1542/​peds.​ 2020-​049734. 26. Bailey-Davis L, Virus A, McCoy TA, Wojtanowski A, Vander Veur SS, Foster GD. Middle school student and parent perceptions of government- sponsored free school breakfast and consumption: a qualitative inquiry in an urban setting. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(2):251–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​ 1016/j.​jand.​2012.​09.​017. 27. Bhatia R, Jones P, Reicker Z. Competitive foods, discrimination, and participation in the National School Lunch Program. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1380–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2105/​AJPH.​2011.​300134. 28. USDA. Unpaid meal charges. https://​www.​fns.​usda.​gov/​cn/​unpaid-​meal-​ charg​es. Accessed 21 Jan 2022. 29. Azarieva J, Livne I, Melamed R, Adler D, Hirsh A. Food for thought: school feeding programs in Israel [Hebrew]. National Nutritional Security Council of Israel, Jerusalem. 2018. http://​www.​ortra.​com/​events/​Porta​ls/​100/​ food%​20for%​20tho​ught.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 30. Cohen JFW, Hecht AA, McLoughlin GM, Turner L, Schwartz MB. Universal school meals and associations with student participation, attendance, academic performance, diet quality, food security, and body mass index: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):911. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ nu130​30911. 31. Poole MK, Fleischhacker SE, Bleich SN. Addressing child hunger when school is closed—considerations during the pandemic and beyond. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(10):e35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMp​20336​29. 32. World Food Programme. Global monitoring of school meals during COVID-19 school closures. 2020. https://​cdn.​wfp.​org/​2020/​school-​feedi​ ng-​map/​index.​html. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 33. Surkes, S. With school out for months hundreds of thousands of kids face food insecurity. The Times of Israel. 2020, November 25. https://​www.​ times​ofisr​ael.​com/​with-​school-​out-​for-​months-​hundr​eds-​of-​thous​ands-​ of-​kids-​face-​food-​insec​urity/. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 34. The Knesset. The Knesset Special Committee for the Rights of the Child. (October 20, 2020) [Hebrew]. https://​main.​kness​et.​gov.​il/​Activ​ity/​Commi​ ttees/​Child​ren/​Pages/​Commi​tteeA​genda.​aspx?​tab=​3&​ItemID=​21470​ 46. Hearing protocol and ancillary documents accessed. Accessed 12 Jan 2021. 35. The Knesset. The Knesset’s special committee for the rights of the child. (November 24, 2020) [Hebrew]. https://​main.​kness​et.​gov.​il/​Activ​ity/​ Commi​ttees/​Child​ren/​Pages/​Commi​tteeA​genda.​aspx?​tab=​3&​ItemID=​ 21493​57. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 36. Vernarelli JA, O’Brien B. A vote for school lunches: school lunches provide superior nutrient quality than lunches obtained from other sources in a nationally representative sample of US children. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):924. 37. Evans CE, Mandl V, Christian MS, Cade JE. Impact of school lunch type on nutritional quality of English children’s diets. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(1):36–45. Page 9 of 9 Azarieva et al. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2022) 11:13 • fast, convenient online submission • thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field • rapid publication on acceptance • support for research data, including large and complex data types • gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year • At BMC, research is always in progress. Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions Ready to submit your research Ready to submit your research ? Choose BMC and benefit from: ? Choose BMC and benefit from: 38. Liu J, Micha R, Li Y, Mozaffarian D. Trends in food sources and diet quality among US children and adults, 2003–2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4): e215262. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jaman​etwor​kopen.​2021.​5262. 39. Oostindjer M, Aschemann-Witzel J, Wang Q, Skuland SE, Egelandsdal B, Amdam GV, Schjøll A, Pachucki MC, Rozin P, Stein J, Lengard Almli V, Van Kleef E. Are school meals a viable and sustainable tool to improve the healthiness and sustainability of children´s diet and food consump- tion? A cross-national comparative perspective. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(18):3942–58. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​10408​398.​2016.​11971​80. 40. Anzman-Frasca S, Djang HC, Halmo MM, Dolan PR, Economos CD. Estimating impacts of a breakfast in the classroom program on school outcomes. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(1):71–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​ jamap​ediat​rics.​2014.​2042. 41. World Food Programme. State of school feeding worldwide. Rome, Italy. 2013. https://​www.​wfp.​org/​publi​catio​ns/​state-​school-​feedi​ng-​world​ wide-​2013. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 42. Berry EM. The obesity pandemic—whose responsibility? No blame, no shame, not more of the same. Front Nutr. 2020;7:2. https://​doi.​org/​10.​ 3389/​fnut.​2020.​00002. 43. Wong KK, Shi J, Gao H, Zheteyeva YA, Lane K, Copeland D, Hendricks J, McMurray L, Sliger K, Rainey JJ, Uzicanin A. Why is school closed today? Unplanned K-12 school closures in the United States, 2011–2013. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e113755. 44. Zheteyeva Y, Rainey JJ, Gao H, Jacobson EU, Adhikari BB, Shi J, Mpofu JJ, Bhavnani D, Dobbs T, Uzicanin A. Unintended costs and consequences of school closures implemented in preparation for Hurricane Isaac in Har- rison County School District, Mississippi, August-September 2012. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0184326. 45. USDA. Meal service during unanticipated school closures. 2019. https://​ www.​fns.​usda.​gov/​cn/​meal-​servi​ce-​during-​unant​icipa​ted-​school-​closu​ res. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 46. Qualls N, Levitt A, Kanade N, Wright-Jegede N, Dopson S, Biggerstaff M, Reed C, Uzicanin A, Group CC, Group CC, Levitt A. Community mitigation guidelines to prevent pandemic influenza—United States, 2017. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 2017;66(1):1. https://​www.​cdc.​gov/​ nonph​armac​eutic​al-​inter​venti​ons/​pdf/​gr-​pan-​flu-​ed-​set.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 47. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Emergency Preparedness and response: school dismissal to reduce transmission of pandemic influenza. November, 4, 2015. https://​www.​theco​mmuni​tygui​de.​org/​sites/​defau​lt/​ files/​assets/​Emerg​ency-​Prepa​redne​ss-​School-​Dismi​ssals.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 48. USDA. Disaster SNAP guidance. 2014. https://​fns-​prod.​azure​edge.​net/​ sites/​defau​lt/​files/D-​SNAP_​handb​ook_0.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 49. UNICEF. Nutrition in emergencies. 2020. https://​www.​unicef.​org/​nutri​ tion/​index_​emerg​encies.​html. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 50. Cardwell R, Ghazalian PL. COVID-19 and international food assistance: policy proposals to keep food flowing. World Dev. 2020;1(135):105059. 51. USDA. FNS responds to COVID-19. https://​www.​fns.​usda.​gov/​coron​avirus. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 52. USDA. Find meals for kids when schools are closed. https://​www.​fns.​usda.​ gov/​meals​4kids. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 53. Adler D, Tepper S, Tzachor A. National Security and Resilience in an Era of Climate Change; in Environment Climate and National Security: A New Front for Israel; (Eds), Michael, K., Tal A., Lindenstrauss G, Boktchin Peles, S., Chanin, D., Weiss, V. (Editors). The Institute for National Security Studies, Tel Aviv 2021. https://​www.​inss.​org.​il/​he/​wp-​conte​nt/​uploa​ds/​sites/2/​ 2021/​02/%​D7%​9E%​D7%​96%​D7%​9B%​D7%​A8-​209-%​D7%​A1%​D7%​91%​ D7%​99%​D7%​91%​D7%​94-%​D7%​90%​D7%​A7%​D7%​9C%​D7%​99%​D7%​ 9D-%​D7%​95%​D7%​91%​D7%​99%​D7%​98%​D7%​97%​D7%​95%​D7%​9F-%​ D7%​9C%​D7%​90%​D7%​95%​D7%​9E%​D7%​99-%​D7%​97%​D7%​96%​D7%​99%​ D7%​AA-%​D7%​97%​D7%​93%​D7%​A9%​D7%​94-%​D7%​9C%​D7%​99%​D7%​ A9%​D7%​A8%​D7%​90%​D7%​9C-​273-​303.​pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2022. 54. Eiran E, Elias M, Troen AM. No bread no peace. Foreign Policy, January 23, 2021. https://​forei​gnpol​icy.​com/​2021/​01/​23/​food-​hunger-​natio​nal-​secur​ ity-​issue-​insta​bility/. Accessed 6 Jan 2022. 55. Qaiyum Suleri A. Hunger: a national security threat. UN Chronicle. https://​ www.​un.​org/​en/​chron​icle/​artic​le/​hunger-​natio​nal-​secur​ity-​threat. Accessed 6 Jan 2022. 56. Finkel E, Azarieva J, Brudny Y. Kazakhstan reminds Putin what he really needs to fear, Opinion Washington Post, January 6th 2022. https://​www.​ washi​ngton​post.​com/​opini​ons/​2022/​01/​06/​kazak​hstan-​is-​remin​ding-​ putin-​what-​he-​really-​needs-​fear/. Accessed 6 Jan 2022. 57. The Ministry of Interior. Assistance in ensuring food security during the COVID-19 crisis. https://​govex​tra.​gov.​il/​moin/​tlush-​mazon/​home/. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 58. Kinderknecht K, Harris C, Jones-Smith J. Association of the healthy, hunger-free kids act with dietary quality among children in the US national school lunch program. JAMA. 2020;324(4):359–68. https://​doi.​ org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2020.​9517. 59. Kenney EL, Dunn CG, Mozaffarian RS, Dai J, Wilson K, West J, Shen Y, Fleischhacker S, Bleich SN. Feeding children and maintaining food service operations during COVID-19: a mixed methods investigation of imple- mentation and financial challenges. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2691. https://​ doi.​org/​10.​3390/​nu130​82691.​PMID:​34444​851;​PMCID:​PMC84​01539. 60. The Ministry of Health. To eat and grow in the afternoon programs. Circu- lar of Head of Public Health Services no. 10/2015. 2015 [Hebrew]. https://​ www.​health.​gov.​il/​hozer/​bz10_​2015.​pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 61. The Ministry of Education. SFP in local authorities. Circular no. 0179. 3 March 2014. [Hebrew] https://​apps.​educa​tion.​gov.​il/​Mankal/​Horaa.​aspx?​ siduri=​179#_​Toc25​60000​45. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 62. The Ministry of Education. Nutrition and education for healthy nutrition in educational institutions. Circular no. 0070. 4 April 2016. [Hebrew]. https://​apps.​educa​tion.​gov.​il/​mankal/​horaa.​aspx?​siduri=​70. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. 63. Peng W, Dernini S, Berry EM. Coping with food insecurity using the sociotype ecological framework. Front Nutr. 2018;5:107. https://​doi.​org/​ 10.​3389/​fnut.​2018.​00107. 64. Peng W, Berry EM. Coping with the challenges of COVID-19 using the sociotype framework: a rehearsal for the next pandemic. Rambam Mai- monides Med J. 2021;12(1): e0005. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5041/​RMMJ.​10425. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- lished maps and institutional affiliations.